# Vigo County Oversight Board — February 26, 2026

No agenda document is listed in the source manifest. This roll is derived
from the timestamped meeting recording; it identifies the distinct topics
heard, not formal agenda numbering.

## Item-by-item roll

1. **Prior minutes** — approved on a voice vote. [0:33](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=33)
2. **Treasurer's update** — the board reported that it had signed engagement letters with Crowe and Barnes & Thornburg but had not yet received invoices. [0:50](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=50)
3. **March meeting schedule** — the board moved its March 12 and March 26 meetings to 5:15 p.m. in the County Council chambers. [1:09](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=69)
4. **School bonding law and referendum rules** — Ice Miller bond counsel presented on school borrowing, debt-service levies, and the state ballot requirements. [2:38](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=158)
5. **Bonding-capacity illustration and financial comparisons** — Baker Tilly's municipal advisor presented a 2026–2028 illustration of borrowing within the school corporation's 2026 debt-service levy-dollar request; no board vote was taken. [19:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=1161)
6. **Follow-up on school financing and facilities** — board members and district staff discussed debt capacity, tax levies, peer comparisons, and future facilities information. [33:29](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=2009)
7. **Public comment and adjournment** — residents commented on representation and a potential referendum; the board later adjourned on a voice vote. [66:32](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAuI8HNdMR8&t=3992)